v66jack
Mar 8, 04:30 PM
Pretty sure Microsoft wouldn't admit to holding every single conversation. I presume once they have obtained all the data they want from your conversation they delete it. But I'm no expert.
Analog Kid
Oct 11, 11:18 PM
Sounds good. :) What about Numbers? I pray they don't dumb it down like Pages, please!
If a word processor can even be dumbed down, it's been poorly designed... Pages is my wp of choice now for just about everything. I find Word too noisy-- I have never used more than half the functions in Word (even after putting in a good effort to "learn to use them effectively").
I agree with the crowd that thinks compatibility is important. There's two levels of compatibility though-- functional and superficial. If they can make it functionally compatible with a reasonable subset of Excel functions, then it will be enough for me to use and share files.
There are times though when superficial compatibility is critical-- where it needs to print and format on another machine just the way you wrote it. I run into this problem with Keynote-- I can export something to Powerpoint to use as a starting point for cleanup, but it's rarely presentable straight from export.
Maybe Cellmate?
I like it! Much better than "Charts" or "Numbers"...
If a word processor can even be dumbed down, it's been poorly designed... Pages is my wp of choice now for just about everything. I find Word too noisy-- I have never used more than half the functions in Word (even after putting in a good effort to "learn to use them effectively").
I agree with the crowd that thinks compatibility is important. There's two levels of compatibility though-- functional and superficial. If they can make it functionally compatible with a reasonable subset of Excel functions, then it will be enough for me to use and share files.
There are times though when superficial compatibility is critical-- where it needs to print and format on another machine just the way you wrote it. I run into this problem with Keynote-- I can export something to Powerpoint to use as a starting point for cleanup, but it's rarely presentable straight from export.
Maybe Cellmate?
I like it! Much better than "Charts" or "Numbers"...
BRLawyer
Mar 10, 12:34 PM
Check that you're using your ISP's DNS servers. I've seen similar problems where users have changed to a different ISP's DNS for troubleshooting reasons and forgotten to change them back, causing geolocation to return a non-optimal server.
This is weird...I've been using Google's DNS servers basically - which are considered as the fastest in my area - does that really affect Apple downloads?
This is weird...I've been using Google's DNS servers basically - which are considered as the fastest in my area - does that really affect Apple downloads?
acidfast7
Apr 21, 02:39 AM
hahaha
I told you guys that appl would never get close to selling 50M iPads this year. 4M in the first quarter looks more 12-15M than 50M.
lol
I told you guys that appl would never get close to selling 50M iPads this year. 4M in the first quarter looks more 12-15M than 50M.
lol
WyldRyce
Apr 24, 10:35 PM
Look at the multi tasking dock as well. Safari and the photo app is in there which he did not run during the video.
liketom
Nov 9, 07:05 AM
WebGrabber (http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/4873)
SiteSucker (http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/22803)
Web Dumper (http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/12801)
Deep Vacuum (http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/20826)
I don't use any of them but you may like to check them out all the same. :)
thanks for them links
a bit rude names though don't ya think hehe
SiteSucker (http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/22803)
Web Dumper (http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/12801)
Deep Vacuum (http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/20826)
I don't use any of them but you may like to check them out all the same. :)
thanks for them links
a bit rude names though don't ya think hehe
mcarvin
Apr 20, 04:13 AM
So the previous "beta" releases on the Mac were just alphas? Interesting. How long has Opera 8 been in the making? I am surprised that they're already releasing it, but maybe it just feels short.
*downloads Opera 8.00b1*
-Chase
The first alpha was posted on Jan. 7, so I'm not sure that this is a "short" job or anything. Opera for Mac snapshots (http://snapshot.opera.com/mac/)
First significant bug - can't install skins anymore. However, I can log into VersionTracker now.
*downloads Opera 8.00b1*
-Chase
The first alpha was posted on Jan. 7, so I'm not sure that this is a "short" job or anything. Opera for Mac snapshots (http://snapshot.opera.com/mac/)
First significant bug - can't install skins anymore. However, I can log into VersionTracker now.
tea&cake
Apr 14, 03:59 PM
Hello... First Post... Its a little long winded but any advice would be greatly appreciated.
I have a dedicated Power Mac G4 2001/2002 (733mhz 1.5GB Ram single processor) linked up to a specialist large format scanner. The G4 operates solely on OS9.2 as the large format scanners software can only work on OS9.2, but this G4 is starting to struggle, possible capacitor issues. I do not have the scanning software discs so am unable to install them onto another computer, and without this software and OS9.2 I would be unable to use my scanner, massive knightmare that I really want to avoid. Ideally I need to try and clone this G4 onto another G4. I have recently obtained a second Power Mac G4 (733mhz 1.5Gb single processor) but it is operating on OSX and does not have OS9 installed on it.
Q: Is it possible to clone my current Power Mac G4 (the OS9.2 operating system & its specialist scanning software) and make an exact clone onto the Power Mac G4 that currently has OSX installed on it?
I have never cloned a computer before, if the above is possible, then I would so greatly appreciate any step by step instructional advice on the above.
Kind Regards,
tea & cake
:apple:
I have a dedicated Power Mac G4 2001/2002 (733mhz 1.5GB Ram single processor) linked up to a specialist large format scanner. The G4 operates solely on OS9.2 as the large format scanners software can only work on OS9.2, but this G4 is starting to struggle, possible capacitor issues. I do not have the scanning software discs so am unable to install them onto another computer, and without this software and OS9.2 I would be unable to use my scanner, massive knightmare that I really want to avoid. Ideally I need to try and clone this G4 onto another G4. I have recently obtained a second Power Mac G4 (733mhz 1.5Gb single processor) but it is operating on OSX and does not have OS9 installed on it.
Q: Is it possible to clone my current Power Mac G4 (the OS9.2 operating system & its specialist scanning software) and make an exact clone onto the Power Mac G4 that currently has OSX installed on it?
I have never cloned a computer before, if the above is possible, then I would so greatly appreciate any step by step instructional advice on the above.
Kind Regards,
tea & cake
:apple:
AVnut
Apr 29, 08:20 PM
I have had some random success using the iPhone configuration utility with installing some apps on my phone. Want to see if it will work on iPad.
I'll pm if someone says yes
TIA
I'll pm if someone says yes
TIA
Hype2k2
Mar 22, 09:29 AM
Sorry to hear that. I really liked the Zune HD interface but MS never created something like the iTune Store. I have seen it in the wild at the university and the interface was actually nice and did things that I wish the iOS would do.
The Zune HD was sweet looking but MS really dropped the ball when they did not put effort into games on it. What I find strange is they are killing the Zune but bringing out a phone interface that mimics the Zune :confused:.
You would think that they could integrate the Zune HD their Phone 7 and Xbox to make something like what Apple has done but NO:rolleyes: that would be just way to out there for MS.
Pretty sure the windows phone 7 team is the zune team. Music players are kind a waste of time now days since just about everyone has a cell phone along with most being capable playing music.
The Zune HD was sweet looking but MS really dropped the ball when they did not put effort into games on it. What I find strange is they are killing the Zune but bringing out a phone interface that mimics the Zune :confused:.
You would think that they could integrate the Zune HD their Phone 7 and Xbox to make something like what Apple has done but NO:rolleyes: that would be just way to out there for MS.
Pretty sure the windows phone 7 team is the zune team. Music players are kind a waste of time now days since just about everyone has a cell phone along with most being capable playing music.
sushi
Aug 7, 07:17 PM
Disappointed to say the least.
Parallels is good no doubt about that. However, I figured that Microsoft could have done better now that we are on the Intel platform. Bummer.
Parallels is good no doubt about that. However, I figured that Microsoft could have done better now that we are on the Intel platform. Bummer.
i.mac
Apr 20, 06:41 PM
What a cash machine. These guys are just printing money these days. What a difference compared to just a few years ago....
I would like to think that apple is getting payed for their hard work and innovation...
I would like to think that apple is getting payed for their hard work and innovation...
jywv8
Sep 7, 11:09 PM
I don't think it hurts that much. Or maybe I've just grown used to it. People compare the sensation to snapping a rubberband against your skin. That seems about right.
Last year I had my doctor start blasting another nearby tattoo -- one much smaller that I never had covered up. That one has been lasered four times, and it is almost gone. You know what they say..."results may vary".
Last year I had my doctor start blasting another nearby tattoo -- one much smaller that I never had covered up. That one has been lasered four times, and it is almost gone. You know what they say..."results may vary".
Daringescape
Oct 12, 10:30 AM
Pages on my G4 ibook and even on my G5 dual 2ghz with a gig of ram is ridiculously slow - like molasses. If this spreadsheet program is this slow I will never use it.
jamieg
Sep 13, 06:45 AM
1) The mini is 2x as expensive as iTV
2) The mini would cost even more with HDMI (at least right now)
3) A lot of consumers just want the simplicity of a set-top box.
4) Others don't want to waste the power of a full computer just as a media center.
Yeah, but if Apple want to compete in the media center market, they will have to produce a small box that will do all....ie put HDMI in Mac Mini (iTV could be a cut down version of this??)
2) The mini would cost even more with HDMI (at least right now)
3) A lot of consumers just want the simplicity of a set-top box.
4) Others don't want to waste the power of a full computer just as a media center.
Yeah, but if Apple want to compete in the media center market, they will have to produce a small box that will do all....ie put HDMI in Mac Mini (iTV could be a cut down version of this??)
maraca2020
Oct 28, 05:08 PM
did some new just come out? any info? thanks
OwlsAndApples
Oct 26, 06:40 AM
Wow! Nice find...good that it'll quieten those 'scratch and smudge' rumours (hopefully) :)
Crystal-RX
Mar 29, 05:53 PM
Shocking.........:confused::rolleyes::D
einsteinium
Jul 10, 02:58 PM
i agree with LeeTom.
Additionally, I called AT&T yesterday. The cap hill store had no idea on quantities, although I'm sure they've gotten their shipment today at the latest. The downtown store told me they didn't know quantities but were allocated more than any other at&t store in the pacific northwest.
i'm thinking i'll try cap hill first, if the line is too long, i'll make the short walk down the hill.
Additionally, I called AT&T yesterday. The cap hill store had no idea on quantities, although I'm sure they've gotten their shipment today at the latest. The downtown store told me they didn't know quantities but were allocated more than any other at&t store in the pacific northwest.
i'm thinking i'll try cap hill first, if the line is too long, i'll make the short walk down the hill.
Lord Blackadder
Mar 7, 03:01 PM
According to Michael Moore, in a recent interview with GritTV (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/03/02/moore_on_wealthy_peoples_money_thats_not_theirs_thats_a_national_resource_its_ours.html), any wealth a rich person has earned is not actually theirs, it's a national resource, it's mine, it's yours, it's our wealth. Based on recent conversations with several of you and many on the left calling for DRASTICALLY higher taxation rates on the wealthiest Americans, I find myself wondering how popular this idea really is. Certainly there is much precedent for this line of thought... Mao, Stalin, Marx, Che, etc. all would have agreed... but where do you sit? Do you make claim to the funds earned by a wealthy entrepreneur? Are these funds up for the taking by popular opinion and political recourse (if we convince enough congressmen, should it be ours for the taking)?
The answer to the final question is emphatically yes, because that is how our government works.
No local, state or national government can govern or maintain infrastructure without some form of income, and an income tax is a fair way for every citizen to contribute to common needs. It is up to the voters to decide how much we all ought to pay.
Everyone seems dissatisfied with our tax system. Some people think the rich and large corporations are taxed too much, others think they aren't taxed enough. We all know which side of that equation you're on fivepoint, but the fact of the matter is we all vote for representatives who embody our views. You vote for people who want to lower taxes on businesses and the rich. I vote for people who favor higher taxes on the rich and large corporations. There is nothing Maoist or Stalinist about it. It's democracy.
The wealthy seem pretty well able to take care of themselves, I have no sympathy for them.
The answer to the final question is emphatically yes, because that is how our government works.
No local, state or national government can govern or maintain infrastructure without some form of income, and an income tax is a fair way for every citizen to contribute to common needs. It is up to the voters to decide how much we all ought to pay.
Everyone seems dissatisfied with our tax system. Some people think the rich and large corporations are taxed too much, others think they aren't taxed enough. We all know which side of that equation you're on fivepoint, but the fact of the matter is we all vote for representatives who embody our views. You vote for people who want to lower taxes on businesses and the rich. I vote for people who favor higher taxes on the rich and large corporations. There is nothing Maoist or Stalinist about it. It's democracy.
The wealthy seem pretty well able to take care of themselves, I have no sympathy for them.
beez7777
Aug 13, 03:27 PM
well done, i like it a lot :)
AVnut
Apr 29, 08:20 PM
I have had some random success using the iPhone configuration utility with installing some apps on my phone. Want to see if it will work on iPad.
I'll pm if someone says yes
TIA
I'll pm if someone says yes
TIA
iRobby
Apr 20, 04:47 PM
Image (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/04/20/apple-reports-best-non-holiday-quarter-ever-with-5-99-billion-profit-for-q2-2011/)
Image (http://images.macrumors.com/article/2011/01/18/161834-apple_logo.jpg)
Q: How are you seeing different opportunities in the large enterprises with your MacBook given the greater receptiveness to the iPhones and tablets. Is it opening doors to get Macs in?
A: Clearly seems to be creating a halo effort for the Mac. In part why we're seeing growth on the Mac side.
I am guilty to be contributing to this. If I had never bought my iPhone 3GS in October 2009 I would not be buying a 27" iMac this year at 2011 refresh as well as getting an iPad2 by year's end. I also will be upgrading to iPhone 5. So yes if it wasn't for the IOS device I wouldn't be helping the Mac revenue. The IOS devices are definitely bringing new customers for the Mac
Image (http://images.macrumors.com/article/2011/01/18/161834-apple_logo.jpg)
Q: How are you seeing different opportunities in the large enterprises with your MacBook given the greater receptiveness to the iPhones and tablets. Is it opening doors to get Macs in?
A: Clearly seems to be creating a halo effort for the Mac. In part why we're seeing growth on the Mac side.
I am guilty to be contributing to this. If I had never bought my iPhone 3GS in October 2009 I would not be buying a 27" iMac this year at 2011 refresh as well as getting an iPad2 by year's end. I also will be upgrading to iPhone 5. So yes if it wasn't for the IOS device I wouldn't be helping the Mac revenue. The IOS devices are definitely bringing new customers for the Mac
Consultant
Apr 30, 02:00 PM
Change PDF to open with Preview
Faster than Adobe Reader
Faster than Adobe Reader
No comments:
Post a Comment