twoodcc
Sep 17, 10:17 PM
What are we talking about? I feel left out of the loop.
(Sorry for the dumb question) :o
sorry, i forgot to mention that it's macrumors' folding@home team. i changed the title of the thread to reflect that. thanks
(Sorry for the dumb question) :o
sorry, i forgot to mention that it's macrumors' folding@home team. i changed the title of the thread to reflect that. thanks
elmnt61
Apr 13, 04:59 AM
Wow, what a ripoff. You can get it done here in Spain for under $30.
mikora7
May 6, 10:50 AM
I reset network settings first. When that didn't work, I hooked it up to the computer and tried a full restore to factory settings. When that didn't work, I tried resetting the network again, so I guess I've done all I can do on my own. I'll look into the cost of repairs. I'm pretty sure I don't have Apple Care so we'll have to see what the best option is. Thanks!
Mal
Apr 20, 09:48 AM
Try the tips here: http://conzone.com/blog/2009/12/mating-a-dell-1110-laser-printer-and-mac-osx/
Never used that printer, so I can't vouch for the solution there, but it looks like good suggestions.
jW
Never used that printer, so I can't vouch for the solution there, but it looks like good suggestions.
jW
alexpros
Oct 8, 11:41 AM
Heres the thing the new wireless spectrum actually is WiMax, to those who don't know what WiMax is, pretty much some people say its WIFI on steroids. Also the fact that if Tmobile is talking to apple it may have to do not only with Iphones but laptops. Wimax works in a way that you can have broadband connections up to 75mbps. So if Tmobile is talking to Apple they are probably going to design a chip or something so that people who buy apple then sign on to Tmobile and will have access to the internet with extremely high speeds anywhere in the US. :) What Tmobile is doing has more to do with Laptops than it would with Phones. Think of it on WiMax you can have IPTV and VOIP running and still surf the net. Not only that Intel and Motorola invested over 1 billion into Clearwire, INTEL IS designing new chips for WIMAX. I dont think this has to do with the Iphones.
Omad0n
Dec 31, 02:06 AM
On the whole I'm going to have to say I don't care much for it. I agree, it just looks really cluttered now, and with a story being squished in the middle, but coming down a long way instead of running across the whole browser window it just feels off. Oh well, perhaps this will inspire me to contribute so the stories can look right again.
jayeskreezy
Aug 21, 01:22 AM
$350...grant it that might be time consuming, but thats about it...I think charging $50 is reasonable
b1scu1t
Apr 14, 08:51 PM
I am getting the same error message as shown below. I have a Linksys router and have done the port forwarding properly. I think this has to do with GRE packets, but I am not sure what is to be done now. Btw I am trying this out with my iMac and iphone.
I am also trying to set up a vpn tunnel so that I can view my cablevision channels on my Ipad while away from home. I followed the instructions but can't get it to work. I am using EASYVPN on an IMAC , but when i try to connect from my Ipad, i get the following messages logged in EasyVPN
2011-04-12 21:26:40 EDT Incoming call... Address given to client = 192.168.1.133
Tue Apr 12 21:26:40 2011 : PPTP incoming call in progress from '192.168.1.1'...
Tue Apr 12 21:26:40 2011 : PPTP connection established.
Tue Apr 12 21:26:40 2011 : Using interface ppp0
Tue Apr 12 21:26:40 2011 : Connect: ppp0 <--> socket[34:17]
Tue Apr 12 21:27:10 2011 : LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Tue Apr 12 21:27:10 2011 : Connection terminated.
Tue Apr 12 21:27:10 2011 : PPTP disconnecting...
Tue Apr 12 21:27:10 2011 : PPTP disconnected
2011-04-12 21:27:10 EDT --> Client with address = 192.168.1.133 has hungup
Any suggestions as to what I'm doing wrong?
I am also trying to set up a vpn tunnel so that I can view my cablevision channels on my Ipad while away from home. I followed the instructions but can't get it to work. I am using EASYVPN on an IMAC , but when i try to connect from my Ipad, i get the following messages logged in EasyVPN
2011-04-12 21:26:40 EDT Incoming call... Address given to client = 192.168.1.133
Tue Apr 12 21:26:40 2011 : PPTP incoming call in progress from '192.168.1.1'...
Tue Apr 12 21:26:40 2011 : PPTP connection established.
Tue Apr 12 21:26:40 2011 : Using interface ppp0
Tue Apr 12 21:26:40 2011 : Connect: ppp0 <--> socket[34:17]
Tue Apr 12 21:27:10 2011 : LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Tue Apr 12 21:27:10 2011 : Connection terminated.
Tue Apr 12 21:27:10 2011 : PPTP disconnecting...
Tue Apr 12 21:27:10 2011 : PPTP disconnected
2011-04-12 21:27:10 EDT --> Client with address = 192.168.1.133 has hungup
Any suggestions as to what I'm doing wrong?
smithrh
Apr 18, 12:02 PM
There's a timing issue here.
While LTE is out, it's not widely deployed yet. Cores of cities are being covered, but many markets don't have coverage yet (true for me personally - my "market" has coverage, but only where I work and not on the commute home, or at home).
Mobile chipsets for LTE are also power-hungry today.
When do you push to have LTE in your handset? Sure, Verizon may be pushing it, but until a device can meet Jobs's's's high bar for performance, I don't see a shift just yet.
Perhaps a delay to September makes things clearer to Apple. Perhaps there's a new chipset coming from QC which doesn't suck space and power (and generate a lot of heat in the process).
September also allows for a bunch more expansion of LTE, specifically VzW here in the states.
While LTE is out, it's not widely deployed yet. Cores of cities are being covered, but many markets don't have coverage yet (true for me personally - my "market" has coverage, but only where I work and not on the commute home, or at home).
Mobile chipsets for LTE are also power-hungry today.
When do you push to have LTE in your handset? Sure, Verizon may be pushing it, but until a device can meet Jobs's's's high bar for performance, I don't see a shift just yet.
Perhaps a delay to September makes things clearer to Apple. Perhaps there's a new chipset coming from QC which doesn't suck space and power (and generate a lot of heat in the process).
September also allows for a bunch more expansion of LTE, specifically VzW here in the states.
dante@sisna.com
Jan 25, 01:44 PM
if i may piggyback onto this question, as i'm in the same boat currently.
given dante's comments about the color inaccuracies of non-ACD monitors (like the HP specifically), I'm wondering whether the built-in mon on the 17" hi-res is accurate?
i'm planning to upgrade out of both a 2.0 coreduo MBP and dual 2gig G5 PM into a single 17" 2.6/8 hi-res MBP and add a 30" monitor to that for home use. If the 17's internal monitor is respectably accurate for printwork, obviously I'll be able to save a few sheckels on the 30" by going HP (enclosure elegance be damned); on the other hand, if the 17 is not accurate it'll make more sense to spend the dough on an ACD.
your thoughts appreciated!
vic
Hi Vic,
I have a 17" MBP (latest version, 17" 2.6ghz, 4gig ram, high res matte screen, etc) and can comment but first let me clear up your characterization of some of posts when you said "given dante's comments about the color inaccuracies of non-ACD monitors (like the HP specifically), "
Let me be specific, It is not that Non-ACD monitors in general are not color accurate, it's just that a few of the monitors mentioned within this post may be display a wider gamut of colors than SWOP (general characterization of Offset and Web Printing, usually CMYK ink) can actually print.
Some of these wide gamut displays do not calibrate well due to a complex process of color interpolation at the video card level, and some do. The HP LP3065 is one that does:
http://www.anandtech.com/displays/showdoc.aspx?i=2950
Just wanted to clear this up so as to not bash HP un-needlessly.
Now for the 17" MPB -- it is good, but not great.
First off a thing about the MBP's -- All their displays are 6bit, and not 8bit like the signal going from a Mac Pro to an ACD. Basically this means that the color range of a MBP is not the same as as that of an ACD or other monitor comparable to an ACD. To make up for the less colors, the drivers dither between the comparable colors.
This makes image edit a bit less accurate for sure.
As far as color accuracy, the Matte MBP's are pretty close to a SWOP gamut, especially in terms of brightness and the feel of "paper."
As far as a MBP being a substitute, I guess it really depends on the level of accuracy you need: photos and art for a newspaper are different beasts than photos headed towards fine art, etc.
I hope this helps a bit.
Dante
given dante's comments about the color inaccuracies of non-ACD monitors (like the HP specifically), I'm wondering whether the built-in mon on the 17" hi-res is accurate?
i'm planning to upgrade out of both a 2.0 coreduo MBP and dual 2gig G5 PM into a single 17" 2.6/8 hi-res MBP and add a 30" monitor to that for home use. If the 17's internal monitor is respectably accurate for printwork, obviously I'll be able to save a few sheckels on the 30" by going HP (enclosure elegance be damned); on the other hand, if the 17 is not accurate it'll make more sense to spend the dough on an ACD.
your thoughts appreciated!
vic
Hi Vic,
I have a 17" MBP (latest version, 17" 2.6ghz, 4gig ram, high res matte screen, etc) and can comment but first let me clear up your characterization of some of posts when you said "given dante's comments about the color inaccuracies of non-ACD monitors (like the HP specifically), "
Let me be specific, It is not that Non-ACD monitors in general are not color accurate, it's just that a few of the monitors mentioned within this post may be display a wider gamut of colors than SWOP (general characterization of Offset and Web Printing, usually CMYK ink) can actually print.
Some of these wide gamut displays do not calibrate well due to a complex process of color interpolation at the video card level, and some do. The HP LP3065 is one that does:
http://www.anandtech.com/displays/showdoc.aspx?i=2950
Just wanted to clear this up so as to not bash HP un-needlessly.
Now for the 17" MPB -- it is good, but not great.
First off a thing about the MBP's -- All their displays are 6bit, and not 8bit like the signal going from a Mac Pro to an ACD. Basically this means that the color range of a MBP is not the same as as that of an ACD or other monitor comparable to an ACD. To make up for the less colors, the drivers dither between the comparable colors.
This makes image edit a bit less accurate for sure.
As far as color accuracy, the Matte MBP's are pretty close to a SWOP gamut, especially in terms of brightness and the feel of "paper."
As far as a MBP being a substitute, I guess it really depends on the level of accuracy you need: photos and art for a newspaper are different beasts than photos headed towards fine art, etc.
I hope this helps a bit.
Dante
Ca$hflow
Apr 4, 06:36 PM
Yep seeing these all over campus now, I'm hoping Apple takes some design cues from the Air and adds them to the MBPs, aka no DVD drive and instead fit a dedicated graphics card in the 13in model and remove the glass screen.
If they do this with a matte display BTO option.... Then I'm in totally. :cool:
If they do this with a matte display BTO option.... Then I'm in totally. :cool:
mlcolorado
Nov 19, 12:22 PM
I went to the Cherry Creek apple store and got there around 5:15. Got a free t-shirt and bought the family pack. It worked great.
zim
Jul 21, 10:53 PM
Benny Benassi's video for satisfaction
I guess it is big with the clubs right now.
Apparently it had appeared on apples QT page for a brief moment in time.
--------------------------------
Push me
And then just touch me
Do I can't get my satisfaction
I guess it is big with the clubs right now.
Apparently it had appeared on apples QT page for a brief moment in time.
--------------------------------
Push me
And then just touch me
Do I can't get my satisfaction
brepublican
Oct 26, 09:46 AM
Wow. Let's hope it looks better than that diagram.
For real. It'd kinda suck not to have the touch click wheel we've seen on most of the mockups. I actually love some of those floating around more than whats dipicted here...
Which brings me to my other point, could people please stop making friggin' mockups??? They'll only make us disappointed when the real deal comes out :mad:
For real. It'd kinda suck not to have the touch click wheel we've seen on most of the mockups. I actually love some of those floating around more than whats dipicted here...
Which brings me to my other point, could people please stop making friggin' mockups??? They'll only make us disappointed when the real deal comes out :mad:
WordAssassin
Jun 24, 03:05 AM
Nice. There's like 30 walk-ins, and about 6 reserves. I'm #6! Woo!
Also, it looks like I'm the only one here with an iPad? Woah.
Also, it looks like I'm the only one here with an iPad? Woah.
danielgrenell
Dec 31, 05:16 AM
god, i much prefer the old site design, please put it back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! oh god please! this won't keep me from visiting, it'll just make my visits more solemn. p-p-p-please put back the old site.
bendejo
Oct 4, 09:30 AM
Yep, I'm with you on that. It already bugs me that my Prius has a black box for accidents and a GPS built in (for the nav system.) Why do we *trust* this government to not ask companies to turn that information over (just like they asked for our phone records) and for these corporations getting billions in tax incentives to eagerly comply? Now if you carry a GPS, government will be able to know where you are at any moment. I'm not buying it unless Apple includes a pledge with the product that they will fight to protect my legal rights if any government agency asks for these records without probable cause.
Most (if not all) new cell phones in America have built in GPS as a result of an FCC mandate for Enhanced 9-1-1 capability in mobile devices. Apple may simply be taking this required expense and turning it into a way to get more value in their device by linking it with a built in camera/iPhoto/GoogleMaps. This certainly seems like one of those "why didn't anyone else do that?" sort of (in retrospect) obvious moves that Apple is great at.
But the fact remains, most new cell phones in the U.S. at least already have GPS built in so the location of the phone can be tracked by emergency responders. It's hardly something new being developed by Apple that will make the iPhone any more subject to governmental data-mining abuse than any other mobile phone.
Most (if not all) new cell phones in America have built in GPS as a result of an FCC mandate for Enhanced 9-1-1 capability in mobile devices. Apple may simply be taking this required expense and turning it into a way to get more value in their device by linking it with a built in camera/iPhoto/GoogleMaps. This certainly seems like one of those "why didn't anyone else do that?" sort of (in retrospect) obvious moves that Apple is great at.
But the fact remains, most new cell phones in the U.S. at least already have GPS built in so the location of the phone can be tracked by emergency responders. It's hardly something new being developed by Apple that will make the iPhone any more subject to governmental data-mining abuse than any other mobile phone.
Wiggum
Apr 28, 03:17 PM
I wanted the change so that I could load it onto my iPad.... which obviously won't boot I.E.
calisoldier83
Dec 30, 07:18 PM
ok, try this: http://www.iphonefaq.org/archives/971187
nice try, this doesnt work without developer firmware
nice try, this doesnt work without developer firmware
citizenzen
Feb 27, 10:01 AM
How ironic that two of the permanent members of the UNSC have invoked the ICC without themselves recognising it.
That's because we're too big to fail. :D
That's because we're too big to fail. :D
PedroCst
Apr 18, 09:08 AM
Hi again :)
Now I'm looking for some cases for my iPhones (3GS and 4), and I was thinking to buy these cases (Feather cases by Incipio):
http://www.myincipio.com/iPhone-4-Cases-Accessories/Incipio-iPhone-4-feather-Ultralight-Hard-Shell-Case.asp
http://www.myincipio.com/iPhone-3G-3GS-Cases-Accessories/Incipio-iPhone-3G-3GS-feather-Ultralight-Hard-Shell-Case.asp
But I'd like to know if these cases are really good.
I've been searching through other pages but Incipio is one of the pages who takes less for shipping them + 3GS case has 50% of discount.
Also I was thinking about buying Zagg's screen protectors for 3GS and 4.
Is this a good deal?
Thanks in advance ;)
Now I'm looking for some cases for my iPhones (3GS and 4), and I was thinking to buy these cases (Feather cases by Incipio):
http://www.myincipio.com/iPhone-4-Cases-Accessories/Incipio-iPhone-4-feather-Ultralight-Hard-Shell-Case.asp
http://www.myincipio.com/iPhone-3G-3GS-Cases-Accessories/Incipio-iPhone-3G-3GS-feather-Ultralight-Hard-Shell-Case.asp
But I'd like to know if these cases are really good.
I've been searching through other pages but Incipio is one of the pages who takes less for shipping them + 3GS case has 50% of discount.
Also I was thinking about buying Zagg's screen protectors for 3GS and 4.
Is this a good deal?
Thanks in advance ;)
heehee
Mar 17, 10:34 AM
I'm sure there is a thread about this, but anyway, I love one of the comments on youtube "What about poor people?" :D
kalex
Apr 17, 01:18 PM
Did u have version 1.0 in itunes? THe way it works is when itunes on mac or computer updates apps from app store, it moves old copy of the app to trash folder on mac or recycle bin on PC. So you can fish it out from there. If you never had it in itunes before then you are out of luck.
Gavzilla2003
Jul 12, 08:44 PM
I have a 15GB iPod for windows and I am trying to convert AAC files (which are on my iPod) to MP3 files so I can transfer them on to my computer. Is there a way to do this with windows.
No comments:
Post a Comment