barkingDog
May 2, 06:28 PM
Bonds79 is just trying to troll Att users into a flamewar. Please don't feed him :rolleyes:
Ah. I see now. :o
I fed this little piece of cruft on another of his threads with a question about a seriously odd statement re: AT&T and data caps.
Had I realized he was an piece of "anti-AT&T" fly-tape ... well, I've no excuse I guess.
@ap3604: Thx man. :)
Ah. I see now. :o
I fed this little piece of cruft on another of his threads with a question about a seriously odd statement re: AT&T and data caps.
Had I realized he was an piece of "anti-AT&T" fly-tape ... well, I've no excuse I guess.
@ap3604: Thx man. :)
fly75
Mar 16, 01:49 PM
If the majority of this forum (not adressing or insulting you) would take of their Apple glasses, they would see the reality or at least the potential of the Windows Phone. I love my mac, but I am not biased to some cult.
Windows Phone launched in November, since then they managed to deliver 10k+ apps (and no, 70% of them aren't spam) ! Faster than both iOS and Android app growth rate when they launched. Of course, Microsoft needs to play catch up right now but they surely DID deliver an almost bug-free system right out the box.
Add that (apparently) they managed to sell around 600K+ phones only in February and the total is now around 2.5 million .. NOT bad for a starter, eh ?
Microsoft spent half a bilion only on advertising. They also "bought" Nokia for 1 billion. They basically bought the best hardware manufacturer (IMO, a smartphone in 2011 with a price of >400$ made of plastic is a cheap joke! No wonder about that 500$ laptop Steve quote ..) thus being able to penetrate markets worldwide much faster. Nokia is still #1 in terms of popularity at least. Agressive to say the least..
Have you actually used a WP? Every single time someone watched mine or played with it they went totally wow. Updates are coming and scheduled already.
Joe Belfiore (the "chief" of WP department) was invited to AllThingsD and while being bashed by that old man Apple fanboy he kept his calm and also stayed totally pro also providing a 2-year time to become a big player.
Android is now where it is because of the time they hit, not because of providing a better experience than iOS. They were the first to fight iOS while others were still cooking their own OS or were still using Symbian lol. It's still a laggy OS even with dual cores for crying out loud.
I am not saying WP is going to beat iOS in 2 years, no way but I see it as Microsoft most ambitious project since 360. And look where that got.
That's one way of looking at it.
Another would be that Microsoft managed to fumble away a substantial foothold in the mobile marketplace before delivering WP7, while watching Apple and Google stake their claims.
Windows Phone launched in November, since then they managed to deliver 10k+ apps (and no, 70% of them aren't spam) ! Faster than both iOS and Android app growth rate when they launched. Of course, Microsoft needs to play catch up right now but they surely DID deliver an almost bug-free system right out the box.
Add that (apparently) they managed to sell around 600K+ phones only in February and the total is now around 2.5 million .. NOT bad for a starter, eh ?
Microsoft spent half a bilion only on advertising. They also "bought" Nokia for 1 billion. They basically bought the best hardware manufacturer (IMO, a smartphone in 2011 with a price of >400$ made of plastic is a cheap joke! No wonder about that 500$ laptop Steve quote ..) thus being able to penetrate markets worldwide much faster. Nokia is still #1 in terms of popularity at least. Agressive to say the least..
Have you actually used a WP? Every single time someone watched mine or played with it they went totally wow. Updates are coming and scheduled already.
Joe Belfiore (the "chief" of WP department) was invited to AllThingsD and while being bashed by that old man Apple fanboy he kept his calm and also stayed totally pro also providing a 2-year time to become a big player.
Android is now where it is because of the time they hit, not because of providing a better experience than iOS. They were the first to fight iOS while others were still cooking their own OS or were still using Symbian lol. It's still a laggy OS even with dual cores for crying out loud.
I am not saying WP is going to beat iOS in 2 years, no way but I see it as Microsoft most ambitious project since 360. And look where that got.
That's one way of looking at it.
Another would be that Microsoft managed to fumble away a substantial foothold in the mobile marketplace before delivering WP7, while watching Apple and Google stake their claims.
CaptainChunk
Mar 13, 09:50 PM
1080p/24 video from the EOS 7D is about 48Mbps, or 6MB/sec. That should give you an idea of how fast of a card you really need for using the camera in video mode. Although it is nice to have a card with fast read speeds when it's time to dump the card.
The ultra-fast CF cards (like UDMA 6) are mostly only necessary for still photographers that quickly shoot using fast cameras in RAW format, where individual images can be 30MB+ and their recording delays need to be a fraction of second.
The ultra-fast CF cards (like UDMA 6) are mostly only necessary for still photographers that quickly shoot using fast cameras in RAW format, where individual images can be 30MB+ and their recording delays need to be a fraction of second.
balamw
Sep 12, 11:33 PM
-Sound Check? (I dont remember seeing that on the ipod, was it there before?)
Yup. That was there...
B
Yup. That was there...
B
TIGOS
Nov 1, 12:05 PM
love it! link?:D
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4008/5134905590_ec6bd9a0ea_o.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4008/5134905590_ec6bd9a0ea_o.jpg
Apple Expert
Apr 4, 05:34 PM
They make the ssd to be 512 and keep the price about 1700-1800 with at least 4th of ram and we got a deal.
Willis
Sep 12, 08:34 PM
Anyone else noticed that the iTunes Mini store has departed us in this version?
Or am I missing it somewhere?
EDIT: Nope.... found it. I noticed the EQ went walk abouts too. Found it under the same menu
Or am I missing it somewhere?
EDIT: Nope.... found it. I noticed the EQ went walk abouts too. Found it under the same menu
TheMacBookPro
Apr 30, 02:27 AM
can you plug in the power cable both ways?
Yep. All the ports are accessible- both USB ports (even thicker items like 3G sticks) , earphone port, mic and MDP.
Yep. All the ports are accessible- both USB ports (even thicker items like 3G sticks) , earphone port, mic and MDP.
Phillie14586
Apr 26, 06:40 AM
I have a mid 2010 MacPro that has had some video problems ever since I got it. I am trying to determine if it is a cable problem or some problem with the video card. I have a monitor connected via the DVI port and this has no problems. I have my TV connected via a minidisplayport with a MDP to HDMI adapter to HDMI cat 5 extender. This is what is giving me problems. Swapping out all this will cost over $100 so I would like to confirm that it is not a hardware issue with the computer if possible.
I run the TV as a second monitor ans when I first set it up at the beginning of the year it would intermittently not detect the TV. I fiddled with things and removed some HTPC programs that were throwing a lot of things to the console logs. I finally got it working just fine for about 2 months. Now all of a sudden it will not always detect the TV. What I need to do to get it working again is to unplug the MDP plug and wait about 15-20 seconds then carefully plug it back in. It may take several times but eventually it will work. Just fiddling with the cables does nothing. There are times I get video but either no audio or audio with a lot of electronic distortion. The only way to fix this is to restart the computer. I am using XBMC as my HTPC software. What is new now is when I am watching a recording the video will go black and the audio will stop for 15-30 sec then the video comes back but no audio for another 15-20 seconds. I can rewind the recording to before it happened and watch with no problem through that section so i don't think it is a corrupted file.
I have looked through console logs but I have no idea what I am looking for if there is a hardware issue. Any thoughts on how to determine if it is a video card issue before I start changing all the wires to the TV? One though I did have was to get a MDP to DVI adapter and connect my monitor to the other MDP port. If it is a MDP port problem then is should happen with both the monitor and the TV.
I run the TV as a second monitor ans when I first set it up at the beginning of the year it would intermittently not detect the TV. I fiddled with things and removed some HTPC programs that were throwing a lot of things to the console logs. I finally got it working just fine for about 2 months. Now all of a sudden it will not always detect the TV. What I need to do to get it working again is to unplug the MDP plug and wait about 15-20 seconds then carefully plug it back in. It may take several times but eventually it will work. Just fiddling with the cables does nothing. There are times I get video but either no audio or audio with a lot of electronic distortion. The only way to fix this is to restart the computer. I am using XBMC as my HTPC software. What is new now is when I am watching a recording the video will go black and the audio will stop for 15-30 sec then the video comes back but no audio for another 15-20 seconds. I can rewind the recording to before it happened and watch with no problem through that section so i don't think it is a corrupted file.
I have looked through console logs but I have no idea what I am looking for if there is a hardware issue. Any thoughts on how to determine if it is a video card issue before I start changing all the wires to the TV? One though I did have was to get a MDP to DVI adapter and connect my monitor to the other MDP port. If it is a MDP port problem then is should happen with both the monitor and the TV.
yippy
Mar 29, 03:27 PM
Or http://eshop.macsales.com/item/ATI%20Technologies/100435338/ you can get the X800
nsjoker
Aug 7, 09:24 PM
Microsoft has to worry about bigger things than getting their OS to run on macs, how about getting their OS to run on a PC (IE: Vista).
Microsoft was late to the plate and I wouldn't be suprised if they just bought out a company to get back in the competition.
take it easy on them, they saved apple's ass in the 90's. if it weren't for them apple would have gone 'rupt. they also have to worry about a thousand different hardware configurations whereas os x 10 has to worry about the mac line.. give 'em a break. (not an ms fanboy) :mad:
Microsoft was late to the plate and I wouldn't be suprised if they just bought out a company to get back in the competition.
take it easy on them, they saved apple's ass in the 90's. if it weren't for them apple would have gone 'rupt. they also have to worry about a thousand different hardware configurations whereas os x 10 has to worry about the mac line.. give 'em a break. (not an ms fanboy) :mad:
Brradley
Sep 2, 12:23 PM
I'm either going to go for a Gelaskin, or a Switch Easy case, either NUDE or colors hopefully.
What case are you hoping is brought out for the iPo4? :)
What case are you hoping is brought out for the iPo4? :)
citizenzen
Mar 6, 11:23 AM
Because their billions sitting in the bank somehow magically make jobs. :rolleyes:
To bring it back to the Michael Moore interview, look at how hard it is to get a loan these days. His point, and mrkramer's as well, is that if the money is just sitting in a bank it's doing less than if it circulated.
To bring it back to the Michael Moore interview, look at how hard it is to get a loan these days. His point, and mrkramer's as well, is that if the money is just sitting in a bank it's doing less than if it circulated.
Blue Velvet
Aug 4, 10:27 AM
Points deducted for the use of Comic Sans. ;)
Edit: I tell a lie, it's not Comic Sans, but close enough. :D
Edit: I tell a lie, it's not Comic Sans, but close enough. :D
compuwar
Mar 16, 12:55 PM
I'm sure you don't want to hear this, but I think you're better off with an iMac or a mac mini with a nice IPS monitor. I understand that the mac pro is easier to expand, but if you plan on keeping it for 4 years you could buy a new mac mini every year and still come out the same.
I just saw this, and I have one point of contention- a Mac Pro can have multiple quad core processors- Minis have a single dual core processor. Depending on the type of photography you're doing, that can make a serious difference- for example, focus stacking, HDR and panoramas will all benefit from more cores. I mentally kick myself every single time I go to stitch a 20+ shot panorama because I "cheaped out" and only got a single QC processor in my Mac Pro.
Paul
I just saw this, and I have one point of contention- a Mac Pro can have multiple quad core processors- Minis have a single dual core processor. Depending on the type of photography you're doing, that can make a serious difference- for example, focus stacking, HDR and panoramas will all benefit from more cores. I mentally kick myself every single time I go to stitch a 20+ shot panorama because I "cheaped out" and only got a single QC processor in my Mac Pro.
Paul
tbluhp
Apr 29, 03:10 PM
it's windows format only because I need to use my hd's on a pc sometimes.
MikePA
Mar 27, 05:57 AM
Or follow a nice, easy iPhone dev related Twitter list, which includes all the main players, like this one:
http://twitter.com/Aubin/iphone-jailbreak-teams
This also allows you to follow all the irrelevant re-tweets comex does, as if anyone cares what he thinks about non-jb topics.
http://twitter.com/Aubin/iphone-jailbreak-teams
This also allows you to follow all the irrelevant re-tweets comex does, as if anyone cares what he thinks about non-jb topics.
Starr
Sep 25, 05:58 AM
Thanx for clearing that up for me, you've just made my life so much easier lol :)
Surf and Turf
Oct 26, 12:22 PM
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com)
Hrmpf reports (http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/90/apple-describes-new-interface-for-ipod) on a particularly revealing patent application from Apple that was published on October 26, 2006.
The name of the patent application is "Electronic Device Having Display and Surrounding Touch Sensitive Bezel for User Interface and Control". The patent describes and depicts a full-screen touch sensitive iPod very similar to the various Video iPod Mockups (http://guides.macrumors.com/Gallery_of_Video_iPod_Mockups) that have been floating around the web. The application was filed in June of 2006.
The focus of the patent is the incorporation of a touch-sensitive bezel (edge of screen) that can adapt to the screen contents to provide an input method for the user. Hrmpf suggests that the use of this non-screen area would eliminate many of the "smudge" and "scratch" concerns for a full-screen touch iPod.
The diagrams included clearly depict what appears to be a full-screen Video iPod. The rumors of a full-screen Video iPod have been ongoing for some time, but picked up steam in February 2006 (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/02/20060209095419.shtml) with claims that the full screen Video iPod would arrive in the coming months. Later reports (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/04/20060413131333.shtml) indicated a delay with some recent reports (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/10/20061018143033.shtml) of a late 2006/early 2007 release.
Numerous other patents have described possible touch-interface methods, but this is the first patent application to depict a full-screen iPod so clearly. It also could represent the "None-Touch" iPod interface that was described in July (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/07/20060724212925.shtml).
Update: There seems to be some misinterpretation of the picture. The circles in the bezel do not represent "buttons". The entire bezel would be a smooth surface that would be touch sensitive. A touch-sensitive Bezel iPod would still look like this mockup:
http://guides.macrumors.com/images/thumb/0/04/Ipodvideo.jpg/120px-Ipodvideo.jpg
This patent was purchased from a company in Buffalo, NY
It will be implemented in the new ipods.
When ?
Hrmpf reports (http://hrmpf.com/wordpress/90/apple-describes-new-interface-for-ipod) on a particularly revealing patent application from Apple that was published on October 26, 2006.
The name of the patent application is "Electronic Device Having Display and Surrounding Touch Sensitive Bezel for User Interface and Control". The patent describes and depicts a full-screen touch sensitive iPod very similar to the various Video iPod Mockups (http://guides.macrumors.com/Gallery_of_Video_iPod_Mockups) that have been floating around the web. The application was filed in June of 2006.
The focus of the patent is the incorporation of a touch-sensitive bezel (edge of screen) that can adapt to the screen contents to provide an input method for the user. Hrmpf suggests that the use of this non-screen area would eliminate many of the "smudge" and "scratch" concerns for a full-screen touch iPod.
The diagrams included clearly depict what appears to be a full-screen Video iPod. The rumors of a full-screen Video iPod have been ongoing for some time, but picked up steam in February 2006 (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/02/20060209095419.shtml) with claims that the full screen Video iPod would arrive in the coming months. Later reports (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/04/20060413131333.shtml) indicated a delay with some recent reports (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/10/20061018143033.shtml) of a late 2006/early 2007 release.
Numerous other patents have described possible touch-interface methods, but this is the first patent application to depict a full-screen iPod so clearly. It also could represent the "None-Touch" iPod interface that was described in July (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/07/20060724212925.shtml).
Update: There seems to be some misinterpretation of the picture. The circles in the bezel do not represent "buttons". The entire bezel would be a smooth surface that would be touch sensitive. A touch-sensitive Bezel iPod would still look like this mockup:
http://guides.macrumors.com/images/thumb/0/04/Ipodvideo.jpg/120px-Ipodvideo.jpg
This patent was purchased from a company in Buffalo, NY
It will be implemented in the new ipods.
When ?
5300cs
Sep 11, 07:50 AM
I was out getting drunk after work- we're 13 hours ahead over here. One of my friends emailed me that an airplane had hit the World Trade Center. My wife also emailed me saying the same thing. I thought it was just a strange accident until I heard the second tower was hit soon afterwards and guessing something was wrong.
It was difficult to turn off the TV and sleep that night as all the Japanese networks were showing the same footage over and over again...
It was difficult to turn off the TV and sleep that night as all the Japanese networks were showing the same footage over and over again...
alust2013
May 7, 01:47 AM
The warranty is void if something goes wrong from you incorrectly installing the RAM.
Apple Care terms and conditions are pretty much worded that way. They do not cover damage caused from an untrained person installing things into the machine.
So, if you don't damage the machine while installing the RAM, there's no problem.
To add, the RAM install is cake, so no need to worry too much about that as long as you're not careless.
Apple Care terms and conditions are pretty much worded that way. They do not cover damage caused from an untrained person installing things into the machine.
So, if you don't damage the machine while installing the RAM, there's no problem.
To add, the RAM install is cake, so no need to worry too much about that as long as you're not careless.
NathP
Mar 25, 05:46 AM
About 30th in the queue right now. The :apple: staff have already been out:
emotion
Oct 25, 09:40 AM
I'm freakin sick of the ITMS. :mad:
I love iTunes and my iPod, but purchasing music that can only be put on an iPod is crap. There may be a better player out later which I want to go to and then *poof* my ITMS purchased tracks are crap.
www.allofmp3.com
It's (significantly) cheaper.
It's better.
'Nuff said.
Not only is that site a pirate site but I personally know many people who run very small independent record labels that have stuff on there without permission.
Avoid these jokers at all costs.
There are legitimate drm-free places to buy digital music.
dynamicvworking out the key from the lock and pass onto another locksmith to make an exact copy to open a house or allow others to tour your house for free is not wrong? gee, what's the point of the lock on you door? what's the point of any password on your keychain (access)?
Stop trying to fight DRM, ignore it or don't buy the crap in the first place
It's a poor analogy because it's actually my door I'm trying to open (I bought the tracks).
Fair use!
AllofMP3 is exactly how all music selling sites should be. The possibility to choose exact what quality you want is great, no DRM is great, the price is of course also great.
If only the artists would get paid it would be perfect. :cool:
If you're going to "steal" music just use limewire or soulseek. Why pay someone to steal it for you? I don't understand.
I love iTunes and my iPod, but purchasing music that can only be put on an iPod is crap. There may be a better player out later which I want to go to and then *poof* my ITMS purchased tracks are crap.
www.allofmp3.com
It's (significantly) cheaper.
It's better.
'Nuff said.
Not only is that site a pirate site but I personally know many people who run very small independent record labels that have stuff on there without permission.
Avoid these jokers at all costs.
There are legitimate drm-free places to buy digital music.
dynamicvworking out the key from the lock and pass onto another locksmith to make an exact copy to open a house or allow others to tour your house for free is not wrong? gee, what's the point of the lock on you door? what's the point of any password on your keychain (access)?
Stop trying to fight DRM, ignore it or don't buy the crap in the first place
It's a poor analogy because it's actually my door I'm trying to open (I bought the tracks).
Fair use!
AllofMP3 is exactly how all music selling sites should be. The possibility to choose exact what quality you want is great, no DRM is great, the price is of course also great.
If only the artists would get paid it would be perfect. :cool:
If you're going to "steal" music just use limewire or soulseek. Why pay someone to steal it for you? I don't understand.
BenRoethig
Oct 12, 02:36 PM
Why on Earth would you expect Apple to ship iWork with it's machines for free? iWork is not MS Works - it's already far superior, and it's still a baby. In one or two more revisions, iWork will be a better overall suite of Apps than Office (which frankly, isn't saying much). It's unreasonable to expect Apple to give that away for free.
I don't know maybe because prior to January every consumer machine shipped since about 1990 has come with a consumer productivity suite and maybe I don't apple to lose sales because of sure stupidity. And yes iWork is like MS works. It is not an office suite, it was never meant to be, and it never will be one. It is the replacement for Appleworks. Hence the name iWork instead of Work Pro. Apple is smart enough to realize that it can't beat Microsoft in the office environment.
I don't know maybe because prior to January every consumer machine shipped since about 1990 has come with a consumer productivity suite and maybe I don't apple to lose sales because of sure stupidity. And yes iWork is like MS works. It is not an office suite, it was never meant to be, and it never will be one. It is the replacement for Appleworks. Hence the name iWork instead of Work Pro. Apple is smart enough to realize that it can't beat Microsoft in the office environment.
No comments:
Post a Comment